Giuseppe Corsaro vs Alessandro Coccioli Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

With Coccioli and Corsaro set to face off, fans are left wondering who might emerge victorious. A deep dive into their statistics offers intriguing insights. How does their second serve hold up under recent scrutiny? Coccioli registers a second serve point win rate of 42.42%, slightly outperforming Corsaro's 38.37%. Historically, success in this area has been a reliable indicator of match outcomes.

The intriguing battle does not end there. When it comes to return games, Coccioli demonstrates a capacity to win 34.29% of points against opponents' second serves, whereas Corsaro shines with a robust 51.39% in this aspect. In first serve retorts, however, Coccioli once again leads with 23.26% compared to Corsaro's 17.27%, and such stats often predict which player might edge out a win in head-to-head matchups.

Facing breakpoints, Coccioli shows resilience, saving 64.29% against Corsaro's 40.91%. This tendency to clutch under pressure can be crucial for those placing in-game bets. Looking at the past year's performances, Coccioli boasts a win rate of 54.55% (12/10), trailing behind Corsaro's 64.71% (11/6), offering a broader view of who could potentially dominate this contest.

Both players have their preferred turfs. Coccioli flourishes on clay, with a 60% success rate (9/6), while Corsaro is formidable on hard surfaces, also winning 60% (12/8). Nevertheless, their struggles on less favored surfaces are telling; Coccioli wavers on hard courts (50%), while Corsaro flounders on indoor hard courts, with no wins to note (0/1).

Both athletes have predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments worth $10K over the last year, with Coccioli and Corsaro recording win rates of 54.55% (12/10) and 64.71% (11/6), respectively. Considering their opponent quality, Coccioli's adversaries possessed an average rank of 203.41, contrasting with Corsaro's higher-caliber challengers, averaging 113.41, which might reflect varying match difficulties.

Should the match reach a decisive set, Coccioli appears to hold a slight edge, having won 20% of such sets in the past year, compared to Corsaro's none. Yet, their break point conversion offers further insight—Coccioli succeeds in 33.33% of these moments, outpacing Corsaro's 18.18%. Given these figures, Coccioli seems poised to clinch the match, leveraging better breakpoint performance and clutch play under pressure.